<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dive Computers Make Diving Safer???</title>
	<atom:link href="http://precisiondiving.net/blog/dive-computers-make-diving-safer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://precisiondiving.net/blog/dive-computers-make-diving-safer/</link>
	<description>Building the Next Generation of Thinking Scuba Divers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:36:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Rojas</title>
		<link>http://precisiondiving.net/blog/dive-computers-make-diving-safer/comment-page-1/#comment-1401</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Rojas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://precisiondiving.net/blog/?p=713#comment-1401</guid>
		<description>I was always interested on dives to 200 feet how each computer reacted differently. (most of us carried 2) not just bottom timers.
I loved my cochran for 2 reasons...back lit red and I was always the first out of the water with using deep stops.
The Uwatec was ALWAYS the one left on the line for another 30 minutes so it didnt get bent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was always interested on dives to 200 feet how each computer reacted differently. (most of us carried 2) not just bottom timers.<br />
I loved my cochran for 2 reasons&#8230;back lit red and I was always the first out of the water with using deep stops.<br />
The Uwatec was ALWAYS the one left on the line for another 30 minutes so it didnt get bent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

