PADI/DSAT Outlines Coming Changes to TecRec Courses

This information came from a PADI meeting in Pattaya, Thailand in which the PADI representatives discussed changes to their technical diving classes. At the time of this article, I do not know if these changes will be PADI worldwide or they are only PADI Asia. These are purposed changes and not currently the standard. The interesting thing I took away from this is that PADI, once again, is making it easier for people to enter their technical diving program. Instead of focusing on firming up their education, they listen to the marketing team. [Read more...]

Practical Application of Ratio Deco

This is a great article giving an example of how ratio deco can be used on any dive. This was written by Brian Wiederspan. Many people either fear ratio deco or completely embrace it. The thing to remember is when using ratio deco and standard gases, the deco curve always looks the same. Therefore, it is much easier to determine “deco on the fly”. I hope you enjoy it.

Dive Safe,
Duane Johnson
Precision Diving

I’d like to take a few moments to illustrate how standard gases and ratio deco have effected my diving recently.

Here, I’d like to talk about the flexibility the standard gases and decompression strategies. Keep in mind that ratio deco isn’t a decompression theory, it’s simply a strategy using existing models and research to help shape an ascent profile.

On our attempt on the SS Governor, we used 15/55 for backgas and EAN50 and O2 for deco. This allowed us a range of depths, generally in the 200’ to 240’ range. That afforded quite a bit of flexibility to explore the wreck, which was especially useful in this case as the wreck is sitting upright where the mudline is at 240’ and the deck is at ~ 200’…quite a variance in depths.

Our plan, however, was to try to keep max depth at 230’, and spend most of our time on the deck at 200’ to keep our average depth at 220’ or shallower, to keep our deco time manageable.

Unfortunately, due to vessel traffic delaying our splash time, we weren’t able to do the Governor. We instead decided to do the Al-Ind-Esk-A-Sea, another large wreck that sank in 1982 after a fire broke out and numerous explosions occurred. Dan Warter has a great article on the Al on his website, DCS Films

Though the profile of the “Al” is similar to the profile of the Governor, it really made me think about what would happen if we were to do another wreck with a completely different profile. In other words, what if we planned to do a wreck that was 240’, but due to conditions, we were forced to do a dive in 200’

Well, for starters, we’d have to make sure our backgas was compatible with the profile of that dive. We had 15/55 in our tanks, which would allow us to go as deep as 240’, and would certainly work for 200’. Now that we know our backgas is ok, we need to figure out our decompression. There’s quite a difference in the deco obligation/profile for a 240’ dive and a 200’ dive. If we simply used the same profile for the 200’ dive as we do for the 240’ dive, our first stop will be much deeper than necessary and our deco time will be much longer than necessary. We could bring out the laptop if we brought it and cut new tables, but we’d also have to print them and laminate them. We could just run our computers as well, which is fine, but if everyone has different computers running different algorithms, that can create some confusion as well.

This is what I like about Ratio Deco…”deco on the fly”, or “tailgate deco” as I sometimes call it, allows me to calculate an entirely new deco schedule in 2 minutes time on scratch paper. Instead of hurrying to pump out a new set of tables, or doing much more deco than necessary because I don’t have any other tables than the ones I made for the original profile, I just grab a pen, a napkin, scroll out my new schedule as a general plan, then relax and prepare mentally for the dive.

How can I do this? Standard gases all have the same deco shape. Sure, we may add extra deco gases, but the shape is the same. No new numbers to remember, no tables to cut every dive. The shape is always the same whether its an mdl dive, Tech 1 dive, Tech 2 dive or a Trimix dive. This makes it very easy to remember and calculate.

How about the reverse? Had we a chosen a mix specific to the depth we planned to go to (or “best mix”), rather than a range and ended up going to a wreck deeper than the one we had originally planned, we wouldn’t be diving at all that day. All that time and effort preparing, the cost of the charter and the gas, and we can’t even dive!

While there’s more benefits to standard gases and ratio deco, these are 2 that I really appreciate and have really positively effected my diving. They allow me to actually explore. We can do our dive, with plenty of flexibility to adjust our profile as needed, then, when our dive is over, we can figure out our deco.

On our dive on the Al-Ind-Esk-A-Sea, we had no tables or deco schedules…nothing written on a wrist slate or in our wetnotes. We did our dive…then, when our dive was done and we were ready to ascend, we figured out our deco. One quick signal of “average depth, 210’” and we both knew what the rest of our profile would look like.

The next 65 minutes we spent decompressing, both of us knowing what the rest of the ascent would look like.